State v. Steinmark’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 88 Ill. 2d 225 - People v. Baynes (1981), State v. Grier (1983)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parker v. State · Jahnke v. State · Weinecke v. State · State v. Gurule · State v. Temple
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The essence of [the] holding was that such testimony was to be treated the same as that of regular public law enforcement officers. Under that holding, the employment of an habitual criminal as an undercover agent makes him an instant public law enforcement officer and clothes his testimony with the same aura of reliability as that of a uniformed police officer. State v. Steinmark, supra, 195 Neb. at 551 , 239 N.W.2d at 498 (Dissenting opinion).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Steinmark v. Parratt“1) Delivery of amphetamines on December 12, 1974; 2) Delivery of marijuana on December 16, 1974; and 3) Delivery of marijuana on December 19, 1974.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Steinmark v. Parratt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.