Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 N.J. 375 - State v. Barden

State v. Barden’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. MacOn · State v. Cofield · State v. Stevens · State v. Marrero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]xcept as otherwise provided . . . evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the disposition of a person in order to show that such person acted in conformity therewith[,]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[i]f other less prejudicial evidence may be presented to establish the same issue, the balance in the weighing process [under the fourth prong] will tip in favor of exclusion.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “inherent prejudice in the admission of other-crimes evidence,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.