¶1 Appeal dismissed, with costs, on authority of Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Rothschild (155 N. Y. 255); no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ.
195 N.Y. 612
89 N.E 1097
Clark v. . Clark
Decided June 15, 1909
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1909-06-15
<p>Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 5, 1909, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for the punishment of defendant for contempt in failing to pay alimony claimed to be due under a judgment of divorce.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1913
1 state decisions
Relies on 9 E.H. Smith 255 - Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Rothschild
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1909-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →