Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 OHIOAPP3D 790 - Kormanik v. Cooper

Kormanik v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh, Acting Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services · Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v Ahlborn · Pratts v. Hurley · Fortner v. Thomas · Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services v. Blumer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court has subject-matter jurisdiction over a case if it has the statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The standard for determining a Civ.R. 12(B)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is whether the complaint states any cause of action cognizable in the forum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.