Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 Okla. 80 - Kasner v. Stanmire

Kasner v. Stanmire’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2025

21 state decisions

70194419501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chamberlain v. Davis · Cochran v. Sullivan · Gulager v. Coon · Reeves v. Caldwell · Davis v. Fariss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The description of the land is sufficient if the contents of the notice will enable the owner and. prospective purchasers to identify and locate the land with substantial certainty, and the purpose of the notice is to warn the owner that his property is to be sold so that he can prevent sale by paying his taxes and to advise prospective purchasers so that they can investigate the property and determine whether they want to bid. Chamberlain v. Davis, 191 Okla. 457 , 130 P. 2d 848 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We conceive it to be the law that substantial compliance with a statute is not shown unless it is -made to appear that the purpose of the statute is shown to have been served.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.