Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 SO 59 - Pope v. Daniel

Pope v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1977
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1977

4 state decisions

201940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tircuit v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co. · Gould v. Bebee · Walker v. Baer-Thayer · Union Sawmill Co. v. Starnes · 5 La. App. 720 - Johnson v. Sylvester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As against a mere trespasser or one who claims no title in himself, the plaintiff is not required to prove a title good against the world in order to recover damages for a trespass on the land. A prima facie title is sufficient, [citations omitted]. But as already stated, where the defendant sets up a title to the land on which the timber was cut, it is incumbent on the plaintiff to prove a title to the land superior to that set up by the defendant claiming ownership of the land from which he admits cutting the timber, [citations omitted].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.