Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

195 So. 2d 249

Selmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 22, 1967

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1967-02-22

Relies on 163 So. 2d 57 - Byers v. State · Dancy v. State · 161 So. 2d 718 - Duncan v. State

Decided 1967-02-22

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed under the authority of Dancy v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 208; Clark v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 773; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57; Duncan v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 718; Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 171 *250So.2d 402, and Anderson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 887.

¶2We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
/195/so2d/249 · .json · Public domain