Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 SO2D 87 - Campbell v. Schmidt

Campbell v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
7
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 168 W. Va. 306 - Addair v. Bryant (1981), 466 So. 2d 856 - Hall v. Hilbun (1985)

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

70196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Granquist v. Crystal Springs Lumber Co. · Avent v. Tucker · 23 Wis. 2d 344 - Jensen v. Heritage Mutual Insurance · 173 F. Supp. 547 - Rogow v. United States · Layton v. COOK'S PHARMACY

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Wells v. Bennett, 229 Miss. 135, 138 , 90 So.2d 199, 200 (1956), we quoted from Avent v. Tucker, 188 Miss. 207 , 194 So. 596 (1940) that: "It seems to be the idea of the writers of the briefs filed on behalf of the appellant in this case that the driver of an automobile having stopped at the intersection at the stop sign — here 49 feet from the intersection — has discharged his full duty to himself from suicide and to the traveling public on a through highway. We want to emphatically state that no opinion of this court has ever absolved the driver of a motor vehicle from exercising care and diligence when proceeding upon a crossing which is much traveled, and at which people are known to travel at a high rate of speed, and if there were no statute in force in this state, common sense would dictate that no driver of an automobile should enter upon an intersection of a much-traveled highway without first ascertaining before it is too late as to the safety of the venture." ( 195 So.2d at 89 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the failure to look was negligence as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.