Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 So. 3d 1242 - State v. Parker

195 So. 3d 1242 - State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · 387 So. 2d 1175 - State v. Steele · 558 So. 2d 552 - State Ex Rel. Adams v. Butler · 676 So. 2d 1068 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Double jeopardy exists in a second trial only when the charge in that trial is: (1) Identical with or a different grade .of the same offense for which the defendant was in jeopardy in the first trial, whether or not a responsive verdict could have been rendered in the first trial as to the charge in the second trial; or (2) Based on a part of a continuous offense for which offense the defendant was in jeopardy in the first trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.