Meadwestvaco Corp. v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Champion v. Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. · 496 So. 2d 91 - Tidwell v. Tidwell · 563 So. 2d 1059 - Dees v. State · 880 So. 2d 459 - Williams Power, Inc. v. Johnson · Bryant v. Flagstar Enterprises, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statement of circumstances constituting good cause for the appellate court to consider the petition, notwithstanding that it was filed beyond the presumptively reasonable time,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]he filing of [a] motion to reconsider [does] not toll the 42-day period for filing a petition for a writ of mandamus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.