Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 195 VA 175 - Weston v. Commonwealth

Weston v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2007

14 state decisions

40195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Near v. State of Minnesota Olson · Grosjean v. American Press Co. · Gitlow v. People of the State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Vile, contemptuous or insulting language addressed to or published of a judge for or in respect of any act or proceeding had, or to be had, in such court, or like language used in his presence and intended for his hearing for or in respect of such act or proceeding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““. . . [F]alse and libelous utterances as to a judge’s conduct of an ended case may or may not be punishable contempt, depending upon whether such utterances present a clear and present danger to the administration of justice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “on the border line[,] we cannot say that beyond a reasonable doubt it oversteps the line and meets the essential requirements of the statute and constitutes contempt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.