¶1(4) Be it ordered by the court that, the said James A. Mitchell, the respondent, having disclaimed any intention of intimidating or influencing this court by the criticism of its opinion in a pending cause, and having satisfactorily qualified, explained, and withdrawn the expressions set out in specifications 2 and 3, and apologized for the use of same, the rule nisi is dissolved, and the respondent is discharged.
196 Ala. 430
In re Mitchell
Decided March 27, 1916
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1916-03-27
Original proceedings in Supreme Court. Be it ordered by the court that one James A. Mitchell, Esq., of Birmingham, Ala., be and is hereby cited to appear before this court at Montgomery, Ala., on Monday, the 27th day of March, 1916, and then and there show cause why his name should not be purged from the roll of practicing attorneys in this court, and why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt of this court (one. or both), because of the writing, publishing, or…
Decided 1916-03-27