Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 Ariz. 188 - State v. Eagle

State v. Eagle’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
4
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably State v. Roque (2006), State of Arizona v. Powers (2001)

55 state decisions

310200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Monge v. California · Patterson v. New York · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causing any physical injury to another person; or 2. Intentionally placing another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent physical injury; or 3. Knowingly touching another person with the intent to injure, insult or provoke such person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “unless the victim is released voluntarily by the defendant without physical injury in a safe place prior to arrest and prior to accomplishing any of the further enumerated offenses in subsection A of this section in which case it is a class 4 felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]hen statutes describe different offenses, consecutive sentences are permissible without implicating the prohibition against double jeopardy”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.