Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 Colo. 569 - People v. Jacquez

People v. Jacquez’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff–Appellee,v.Richard Alfred STROCK, Defendant–Appellant. (2010), People v. Thomas (1994)

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

16019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 39 Colo. App. 409 - People v. Salazar · People v. Enlow · Swift v. People · People v. Hernandez · Rodriquez v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"the time of a prior conviction ... is the date the judgment of conviction is entered in the trial court. It is evident from the language used that a plea of guilty, a guilty verdict, or a finding of guilt by the trial judge, alone, could not effectively be used to enhance the punishment for the reason that the conviction process is incomplete. Until there has been an adjudication of guilty by the entry of judgment, the fact of guilt has not been judicially declared."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'The term 'conviction' may be interpreted differently depending upon the statute in which it is used and the issue in a particular case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[the keynote is the legislative intent behind the use of the word in the statute in question.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.