State v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Commonwealth v. Grant (2002), State v. Leecan (1986)
61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · State v. Scielzo · State v. Lubesky · Blue v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In State v. Talton, 197 Conn. 280 , 297 (1985): The test that measures ineffective assistance of counsel requires a defendant to make two showings, that trial counsel's performance was not reasonably competent or within the range of ordinary training and skill in the criminal law, and that trial counsel's lack of competence contributed to the defendant's conviction. State v. Tirado, 194 Conn. 89 , 91-92 , 478 A.2d 606 (1984); State v. Gregory; [ 191 Conn. 142 , 143 , 463 A.2d 609 (1983)]; State v. Chairamonte, 189 Conn. 61 , 63 , 454 A.2d 272 (1983); see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)." State v. Rivera, 196 Conn. 567 , 570 , 494 A.2d 570 (1985).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The deliberate bypass rule serves two important functions: (1) it encourages a litigant to have all constitutional claims resolved in a single proceeding economizing the time and resources of all concerned parties and bringing the case to a conclusion; and (2) it prevents a prisoner from deliberately deferring his claims of unlawful confinement until a time when a new trial, if required as a result of the collateral proceeding, would be, for all practical purposes, impossible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.