Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 F.1d 16 - Schmulbach v. Caldwell

Schmulbach v. Caldwell’s Empirical Analysis

196 F. 16 · 1912

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2010

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

4019121920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sun Printing Publishing Association v. William L Moore · Meriwether Clark v. Andrew Smith · Sheffield Furnace Co. v. Witherow · Bartlett v. Stanchfield · Davis v. Alvord

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The decisions of this court on the doctrine of liquidated damages and penalties lend no support to the contention that parties may not bona fide, in a case where the damages are of an uncertain nature, estimate and agree upon the measure of damages which may be sustained from the breach of an agreement. On the contrary, this court has consistently maintained the principle that the intention of the parties is to be arrived at by a proper construction of the agreement made between them, and that whether a particular stipulation to pay a sum of money is to be treated as a penalty, or as an agreed ascertainment of damages, is to be determined by the contract, fairly construed; it being the duty of the court always, where the damages are uncertain and have been liquidated by an agreement, to enforce the contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.