Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 F.1d 509 - The Gallia

The Gallia’s Empirical Analysis

196 F. 509 · 1910

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1935
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Albina Ferry Co. v. The Imperial · Atlas S. S. Co. v. The Chicago · Atlas S. S. Co. v. The Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The mere presence of the pilot makes no difference. * * * Hesponsibility and liability must depend upon matters of substance, and not on mere form. If the pilot had really been in command, the ship would have been primarily responsible, even though the proximate cause of the damage had been the disobedience or incompetence of tug masters who were furnishing the motive power. But this pilot was not in command and he was guilty of no personal negligence. Therefore, the ship with which ho is identified is absolved.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.