Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

196 F.2d 162

Docket No. 13129.

Schaefer v. Macri

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1952.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-04-25

4 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-04-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1993

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

5019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1M. C. Schaefer, appellant, in propria persona.

¶2W. Paul Uhlmann, Altha P. Curry, Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann, Seattle, for appellee W. R. McKelvy.

¶3Carl E. Croson, Willard Hatch, Seattle, Wash., for appellee Continental Cas. Co.

¶4Granville Egan, Seattle, Wash., for appellees Sam Macri, Don Macri and Joe Macri.

¶5Before HEALY, BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a second amended complaint for failure to state a cause entitling plaintiff to damages or other relief.

¶8The dismissal was clearly warranted. Plaintiff’s attempt, apparently, was to state a cause against the appellees in civil conspiracy. His pleading is couched mainly in verbose generalities, irrelevancies and conclusions, no facts being set out showing that there was a concert of action among the defendants, none from which a proper inference of collusion may be drawn and none stated which shows that any damage to the plaintiff resulted as a natural or probable consequence of the acts alleged.

¶9Judgment affirmed.

/196/f2d/162 · .json · Public domain