Dodd v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
196 F.2d 190 · 1952
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
January 1969
most recently cited
17 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Hahn v. United States · Whitney v. Zerbst · McMahan v. Hunter · Hall v. Johnston · Frame v. Hudspeth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ [1] By the court’s acceptance of the pleas of guilty in these circumstances, it resolved the issue of the appellants’ mental capacity to. know and understand the nature of the charge against them and to assist in their defense, and its judgments thereon are not subject to collateral attack. Hahn v. United States, 10 Cir., 178 F.2d 11 ; McMahan v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 150 F.2d 498 ; Srygley v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 264 ; Hall v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 86 F. 2d 820 ; Whitney v. Zerbst, 10 Cir., 62 F.2d 970 . Cf. Frame v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 109 F.2d 356 ; Hallowell v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 186 F.2d 873 .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.