Roeser & Pendleton, Inc. v. Commissioner

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1952.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-03-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1955

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on M-B-K Drilling Co. v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-03-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1C. D. Ellison, Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner.

¶2Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, and Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. G, for respondent.

¶3Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

¶4 *222PER CURIAM.

¶5Affirmed per stipulation on authority, M-B-K Drilling Company, Inc., etc., v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10 Cir., 1952, 194 F.2d 221.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Alfred Paul Murrah
Chief Judge
Orie Leon Phillips
Chief Judge
John Coleman Pickett
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

C. D. Ellison, Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner.

Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., and Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, and Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. G, for respondent.