Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

196 F.2d 496

Docket No. 4390.

McRae v. Woods

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1952.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1952.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-04-18

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1954

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ambrosia Chocolate Co. v. Ambrosia Cake Bakery, Inc. · McRae v. Creedon · McRae v. Woods

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-04-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*497Gretchen McRae, pro se.

¶2Cecil H. Lichliter, Special Litigation Attorney, Office of Rent Stabilization, Washington, D. C. (Ed Dupree and A. M'. Edwards, Jr., Washington, D. C., were with him on the brief) for appellee.

¶3Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court of Colorado, denying certain motions of the appellant Gretchen McRae, seeking to review previous rulings of the trial court, including a final judgment in favor of the appellee, entered September 9, 1947, and from which no appeal was taken. The full history of this litigation will be found in Porter v. McRae, 10 Cir., 155 F.2d 213; McRae v. Creedon, 10 Cir., 162 F.2d 989, and McRae v. Woods, Em.App., 165 F.2d 790, certiorari, denied 333 U.S. 882, 68 S.Ct. 912, 92 L.Ed. 1157, and it would serve no useful purpose to recount it here.

¶6Without enumerating the many pleadings filed, and contentions made, subsequent to the prior litigation, it is sufficient to say that they raise only issues which were presented, tried and finally decided in the former litigation.

¶7The trial court correctly decided that the pleadings presented no new issues and its judgment is affirmed.

/196/f2d/496 · .json · Public domain