Barber v. Yanish’s Empirical Analysis
196 F.2d 53 · 1952
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1001 · 5 U.S.C. § 1004
Relies on Beazell v. State of Ohio Chatfield · Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath · Ng Fung Ho v. White · Thompson v. State of Missouri · John Mallett v. State of North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * The enactment by Congress of legislation which would exempt deporation proceedings from the requirements of sections 5, 7, and 8 of the Administrative Procedure Act would in no way result in denial of a fair hearing to an alien charged in a deportation process. * * * [Deportation Proceedings] would be governed by regulations which would retain sufficient flexibility to meet changing conditions and, in the language of The Japanese Immigrant Case, would `secure the prompt vigorous action contemplated by Congress, and at the same time be appropriate to the nature of the case upon which such officers are required to act' * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.