Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 F.2d 866 - Acheson v. Wohlmuth

Acheson v. Wohlmuth’s Empirical Analysis

196 F.2d 866 · 1952

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
February 1966
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 801

Relies on Moser v. United States · Savorgnan v. United States · Mackenzie v. Hare · Acheson v. Murata · Geach v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““the intent of Congress in the Nationality Act was to attach the consequence of loss of citizenship to conduct which substantially evidences allegiance to a government existing in a territory other than our own. * * * When we come to consider the meaning of Section 401 (e) as a whole, it becomes apparent that Congress there sought to distinguish between acts performed in the interest of maintaining our own governmental institutions and acts which tend to support or implement institutions other than our own.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.