Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 F.2d 874 - Weldon v. United States

Weldon v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

196 F.2d 874 · 1952

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 1994
most recently cited

33 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1994 · most notably Di Bella v. United States (1962), United States v. Martinson (1987)

33 federal appellate ·

23019521960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 152 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2107

Relies on Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States · Perlman v. United States · Cogen v. United States · Railroad Commission v. Maxcy · United States v. Poller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Actually, as stated above, [Weldon] was not indicted or informed against. Hence no criminal action was pending against him when the petitions were filed. Hence both petitions were independent proceedings. Obviously, these were civil proceedings — in effect, civil actions to recover personal property and to enjoin an allegedly wrongful use thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.