Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 F.3d 1 - In Re Mailman Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp

In Re Mailman Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

173
cited by 173 later decisions
February 2020
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 40 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 173 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Amsouth Bank v. Dale (2004), Fj Hanshaw Enterprises Inc Frederick Hanshaw v. Emerald River Development Inc Gordon Richard a Marshack (2001)

13 federal appellate · 40 district ·

1280200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Medina-Munoz v. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company · Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc. · Barton v. Barbour · Mosser v. Darrow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 173 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The bankruptcy court appropriately took judicial notice of its own docket.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] long line of cases has required leave from the bankruptcy court before allowing an action against the trustee to proceed in another tribunal . Neither these precedents nor the rationale that undergirds them have any application to proceedings in the court that is overseeing administration of the bankruptcy estate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “bankruptcy court [is authorized] ... to take judicial notice of its own docket”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.