Rhoades v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
196 F.3d 592 · 1999
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Tittle v. Enron Corp. (2006), Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc. v. King Construction of Houston, L.L.C. (2015)
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Boggs v. Boggs · Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc. · Lumpkin v. Envirodyne Industries, Inc. · Henry v. Office of Thrift Supervision
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An interpleader action typically involves two stages. In the first stage, the district court decides whether the requirements for rule or statutory interpleader action have been met-by determining if there is a single fund at issue and whether there are adverse claimants to that fund. 7C Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal Practioe & Procedure 2d § 1714 (1986). If the district court finds that the interpleader action has been properly brought[,] the district court will then make a determination of the respective rights of the claimants.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“held that the plain, preclusive language of § 1818(i) 'provides ... clear and convincing evidence that Congress intended to deny the District Court jurisdiction to review and enjoin' administrative proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The legislative purpose of an interpleader action is to remedy the problems posed by multiple claimants to a single fund, and to protect a stakeholder from the possibility of multiple claims on a single fund.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.