Jenkins v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
196 F.3d 922 · 1999
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Jerold H. Nevland v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security (2000), Shontos v. Barnhart (2003)
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Kelley v. Callahan · Ghant v. Bowen · Riley v. Shalala · Ness v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, including the new evidence submitted after the determination was made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In addition to evidence before the ALJ, the record includes evidence that was submitted after the hearing and considered by the Appeals Council in denying review. Riley v. Shalala, 18 F.3d 619, 622 (8th Cir.1994). Evaluating such evidence requires us to determine how the ALJ would have weighed the newly submitted evidence if it had been presented at the original hearing. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“considered substantial evidence in the face of the conflicting assessment of a treating physician”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harvey v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.