Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

196 F. App'x 164

Sadler v. Tilley

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2006

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-08-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2013

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-08-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Zara Ellis Sadler seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting her motion to appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Sadler seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny Sadler’s motion to change venue. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2DISMISSED.

/196/fappx/164 · .json · Public domain