Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 FRD 653 - Steiner Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins

Steiner Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
August 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc. · 63 Cal. 2d 9 - Seely v. White Motor Co. · Dennis v. Dennis · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The economic loss doctrine applies to the service industry only where the duty of the party performing the service is defined by the contract between him and his client. Where a duty arises outside of that contract, the doctrine does not prohibit recovery under a tort theory for the negligent breach thereof .... We find that this failure was a breach of his duty to observe reasonable professional competence which existed independently of the insurance policy or contract. We therefore find that [the insurance broker’s] duty to plaintiffs, his insureds, in performing insurance brokerage services was not solely defined by contract, but rather was extracontractual in nature. As such, the economic loss doctrine does not bar plaintiffs’ recovery of their economic damages under a tort theory for [the insurance broker’s] negligent breach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.