Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 FSUPP2D 281 - Chao v. Vidtape, Inc.

Chao v. Vidtape, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2041 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 211 · 29 U.S.C. § 212 · 29 U.S.C. § 215

Relies on Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. · Corning Glass Works v. Brennan · McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co. · Falk v. Brennan · Herman v. RSR Security Services Ltd.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.