Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 Kan. 118 - Murphy v. Murphy

Murphy v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2012

22 state decisions

80196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wear v. Wear · Moloney v. Moloney · Moloney v. Moloney · Price v. Price · Turner v. Melton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . ’ If the restraint is found to be wrongful . . . the court may make such other orders as . . . the welfare of a minor physically present in the state may require. . . (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.