Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 Kan. 313 - Miller v. Braun

Miller v. Braun’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2018

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

140196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Steck v. City of Wichita · Hutson ex rel. Templar v. Imperial Royalties Co. · Collins v. City Cabs, Inc. · Quick, Receiver v. Purcell · Hengel v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'It is generally held that statements by counsel that certain evidence will be introduced are not improper if made in good faith and with reasonable ground to believe that the evidence is admissible, even though the intended proof referred to is afterward excluded. However, in the absence of good faith, or where prejudice is clearly produced, whether as the result of accident, inadvertence, or misconception, the rule is to the contrary.' " (quoting 53 Am. Jur., Trial § 456, p. 358).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.