Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 Kan. 411 - McCall v. State

McCall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
June 1975
most recently cited

48 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Hudspeth · Call v. State · State v. Burnett · State v. Nichols · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . That point was specifically raised in the petitioner’s first motion and was determined on the merits adversely to his contention. No appeal was taken from that judgment and it became final. The rightness or wrongness of the district court’s decision on that point may not now be inquired into. . . .” (p. 233.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.