Kelly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Taylor v. United States · State v. Burnett · Johnson v. Crouse · Goodwin v. State · State v. Messmore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . Assuming that prior notice of the hearing was not given, the defendant was present at the hearing with his attorney, and no contention is made that he did not have full opportunity to be heard on all matters under consideration and to controvert the allegation that he had been convicted of previous felonies which would make him subject to the penalties of the habitual criminal statute. The time for complaint was then, not now. . . .” (p. 347.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lieser v. State““. . . The corollary of the requirements that a full, or plenary, hearing be accorded a prisoner, when substantial questions are raised, is the court’s right to dispense with such a complete hearing and to determine the questions submitted in a more summary fashion whenever, ‘the files and records of the case conclusively show that the movant is entitled to no relief.’ ” (p. 647.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.