State v. Mader’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2006
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilson v. United States · Hem v. United States · State v. Wright · State v. Murphy · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Under these circumstances it has been held where an appellant relies upon an alleged error of the court in refusing to give a particular instruction, and only the one instruction is presented to this court for consideration, error will not be predicated upon the refusal to give such instruction, especially where it is claimed by the appellee that the substance of the instruction was in fact given in other instructions. ( State v. Murphy, 145 Kan. 242 , 65 P.2d 342 ; and State v Reilly, 85 Kan. 175 , 116 Pac. 481 .)" (l.c. 476.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McCorvey““ . . However, this inference is rebuttable and does not relieve the State from the duty of proving the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.’” (p. 474.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jarvis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.