Gladen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

cited by 41 later decisions

states following

June 2022

most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably State v. Greenlee (1980), State v. McCarty (1967)

41 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Oyler v. Boles · Snowden v. Hughes · Cannon v. United States · Western Natural Gas Co. v. Cities Service Gas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““The exercise of discretion by a county attorney in seeking to invoke the provisions of the habitual criminal act (K. S. A. 21-107a) without a showing of discrimination by reason of willful, arbitrary, designed, deliberate, intentional or concerted action, does not deprive one of due process or equal protection of the law guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution in a case where an enhanced penalty was imposed under the act.” (Syl. ¶[ 2.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Scoggins v. State · State v. Shaw
““. . . There is a presumption that a public official will act fairly, reasonably and impartially in the performance of the duties of his office. Lyerla v. Lyerla, 195 Kan. 259 , 403 P. 2d 989 ; Sutherland v. Ferguson, 194 Kan. 35 , 397 P. 2d 335 ; State v. Emory, 193 Kan. 52 , 391 P. 2d 1013 , cert. den. 379 U. S. 906 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 179 , 85 S. Ct. 200 .) . . .” (l. c. 590.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Weniger · State v. Young
“"... [T]he conscious exercise of some selectivity in enforcement is not in itself a federal constitutional violation. Even though the statistics in this case might imply a policy of selective enforcement, it was not stated that the selection was deliberately based upon an unjustifiable standard such as race, religion, or other arbitrary classification...." (p. 456.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Collins · State v. Keys

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.