Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 Kan. 622 - State v. Crowe

State v. Crowe’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2006

16 state decisions

6019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wright · State v. Poulos · State v. Hook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that defendant’s possession of the property was brief or that he had not completely removed it from the owner’s premises prior to detection does not militate against the integrity of the offense.” 196 Kan. at 625 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.