Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 Kan. 689 - Newman v. Case

Newman v. Case’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 1971
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kendrick v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad · Sponable v. Thomas · Drake v. Moore · Fisher v. O'Brien · Anderson v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Contributory negligence is never presumed, but must be established by proof. Ordinarily, its existence in a given case is a question of fact, it being for the jury to decide whether the conduct of a party measures up to that expected of a reasonably careful man. Only when conduct can be said as a matter of law to have fallen below the standard of a reasonably prudent person may the question of contributory negligence be taken from the jury and determined by the court.” (p. 691.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The rule announced by this court, that where a person drives an automobile along a highway on a dark night at such speed that the car cannot be stopped or turned aside within the range of vision of the lights on his car, such person is guilty of negligence as a matter of law, has many exceptions involving questions of fact.” (Syl. f 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.