196 Md.
Volume 196 — Maryland Reports
89 opinions
- 196 Md. 1Emery v. F. P. Asher, Jr., & Sons, Inc. (1950)
- 196 Md. 15Molesworth v. Schmidt (1950)
- 196 Md. 22American Bank Stationery Co. v. State (1950)
- 196 Md. 31Southern Maryland Agriculture Ass'n v. Meyer (1950)
- 196 Md. 36Nesbit v. Cumberland Contracting Co. (1950)
- 196 Md. 45Hebden v. Keim (1950)
- 196 Md. 52Clark v. Kirsner (1950)
- 196 Md. 57Lambert v. State (1950)
- 196 Md. 70Dean v. Scott (1950)
- 196 Md. 77Francis v. MacGill (1950)
- 196 Md. 86Welsh v. Kuntz (1950)
- 196 Md. 99Perlmutter v. Minskoff (1950)
- 196 Md. 112Ford v. Union Trust Co. of Md. (1950)
- 196 Md. 118Valench v. Belle Isle Cab Co. (1950)
- 196 Md. 125McMahon v. Consistory of St. Paul's Reformed Church (1950)
- 196 Md. 136Oak Lane Corporation v. Duke (2001)
- 196 Md. 141Baltimore Transit Co. v. Hessey (1950)
- 196 Md. 152Adams v. May (2001)
- 196 Md. 160Smith v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc. (2001)
- 196 Md. 168Ashman v. Schecter (2001)
- 196 Md. 177Shub v. Simpson (1950)
- 196 Md. 207Christman v. Weil (2001)
- 196 Md. 213Robinson v. Gardiner (2001)
- 196 Md. 219Smith v. Smith (2001)
- 196 Md. 222Murray v. Swenson (2001)
- 196 Md. 233Edwards v. State (2001)
- 196 Md. 238Dente v. Bullis (2001)
- 196 Md. 242Blair v. Baker (2001)
- 196 Md. 252Caughy v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. (2001)
- 196 Md. 262Ringgold v. Carvel (2001)
- 196 Md. 274Commercial Realty Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp. (2001)
- 196 Md. 280True v. MAYOR ETC. OF WESTERNPORT (2001)
- 196 Md. 290Berlinsky v. Eisenberg (1950)
- 196 Md. 293Levin v. Stratford Plaza, Inc. (2001)
- 196 Md. 310Crotty v. Browning (1950)
- 196 Md. 318Kuhn v. Carlin (2001)
- 196 Md. 326Mickey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2001)
- 196 Md. 334Rucker v. State (1950)
- 196 Md. 341State v. Adams (2001)
- 196 Md. 351Hitchcock v. Kloman (2001)
- 196 Md. 357Ace Development Co. v. Harrison (2001)
- 196 Md. 370Kendall v. Housing Authority (2001)
- 196 Md. 384Day v. State (1950)
- 196 Md. 400Johnson v. Board of Zoning Appeals (1950)
- 196 Md. 413Montgomery County v. Bigelow (2001)
- 196 Md. 428Martin v. United Slate, Tile & Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers' Ass'n (2001)
- 196 Md. 443Price v. McFee (1950)
<italic>Partnership — Witnesses — Transactions with Deceased — In Action</italic><italic>by Administratrix of Deceased Partner against Survivor, Latter's</italic><italic>Testimony as to Transactions with Deceased, Properly Excluded —</italic><italic>Property of Partnership — Property in Name of Partner as</italic><italic>Constituting — Use of Partnership Funds in Purchase Is Strong</italic><italic>Evidence — But Intent of Partners Controlling, as Shown by</italic><italic>Circumstances Surrounding Purchase, and Conduct of Parties toward</italic><italic>Property Thereafter — Evidence Justified Finding, Insurance</italic><italic>Policy Was Separate Property of Deceased Partner, though Premiums</italic> <italic>Paid for Time with Partnership Funds</italic>. In action in assumpsit by widow and administratrix of deceased partner against surviving partner for the balance, equal in amount to the proceeds of a certain life insurance policy on deceased's life which had been paid to plaintiff as beneficiary, due on account of plaintiff's intestate's interest in the partnership, withheld by defendant pursuant to a purported agreement between the partners, under the terms of which the proceeds of life insurance policies which the partners might agree to buy were to be made payable to the respective partner's personal representative, and the premiums payable out of partnership funds, the proceeds to be credited against amounts due such personal representative for the interest of deceased partner in the partnership, <italic>held</italic> the trial court, under Code (1939) Art. 35, § 3, properly refused to permit defendant to testify as to transactions with deceased. pp. 447-448 The use of partnership funds for the purchase of property is strong, but by no means conclusive, evidence tending to show that the partners considered the property as belonging to the partnership. p. 448<page_number>Page 444</page_number> The criterion for determining whether property held in the name of one partner is to be considered as partnership property is the intention of the partners to devote it to partnership purposes at the time the property was acquired, as shown by the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction of purchase, considered in connection with the conduct of the parties toward the property after the purchase. p. 448 In action of assumpsit by widow and administratrix of deceased partner against surviving partner for a sum withheld from the admitted value of deceased's interest in the partnership as paid by defendant to plaintiff, equal to the proceeds of a certain life insurance policy which had been paid to the widow as beneficiary, purportedly pursuant to an agreement between deceased and defendant under which any partnership life insurance taken out by the partners was to be payable to their respective personal representatives and was to constitute a part of the payment made to such personal representative in respect of the interest of his decedent in the partnership, and the premiums on such insurance were to be paid out of partnership funds, <italic>held,</italic> the following four evidentiary factors, <italic>inter alia,</italic> sustained the conclusion of the trial court, sitting without a jury, that the partners intended the policy to belong to deceased individually, and not to the partnership, and therefore sustained its judgment for plaintiff: (1) fact that at the date of the policy there was no written agreement in existence providing for partnership life insurance, though a prior partnership agreement had contained the terms of the contract contended for by defendant; (2) the firm accountant was never instructed as to how to charge the premiums on the firm's books, but had charged them to the partnership account on his own initiative until objection by the Bureau of Internal Revenue, upon the occurrence of which event, the partners at once without comment instructed him to charge the premiums on their policies to their respective accounts; (3) the policies were never carried as assets on the books of the firm; (4) the policy herein<page_number>Page 445</page_number> in question was kept not with the partnership assets but at the home of deceased. pp. 449-450 M.C.P., Jr. <italic>Decided December 7, 1950</italic>.
- 196 Md. 450Vane v. C. Hoffberger Company (1950)
- 196 Md. 459State ex rel. Landis v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad (1950)
- 196 Md. 465Heffner v. Admiral Taxi Service, Inc. (1950)
- 196 Md. 475Donner v. Calvert Distillers Corp. (1950)
- 196 Md. 494Reicher v. Reicher (1950)
- 196 Md. 501Dotterer v. Dotterer (1950)
- 196 Md. 504Kublitsky v. Zimnoch (1950)
- 196 Md. 509Brodsky v. Hull (1950)
- 196 Md. 519Bull Steamship Lines v. Fisher (1950)
- 196 Md. 530Department of Tidewater Fisheries v. Catlin (1950)
- 196 Md. 539Weiner v. Weirich (1950)
- 196 Md. 543Evans v. Shiloh Baptist Church (1950)
- 196 Md. 552State Roads Commission v. Lassiter (1950)
- 196 Md. 555Grantmyre v. Darago (1950)
- 196 Md. 565Marlboro Shirt Co. v. American District Telegraph Co. (1951)
- 196 Md. 572Sun Cab Co. v. Powell (1951)
- 196 Md. 584Fowser Fast Freight v. Simmont (1951)
- 196 Md. 595Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Hairston (1951)
- 196 Md. 599Tatelbaum v. National Store Fixture Sales Co. (1951)
- 196 Md. 609Miller v. Graff (1951)
- 196 Md. 620Keystone Engineering Corp. v. Sutter (1951)
- 196 Md. 630Kenny v. Peregoy (1951)
- 196 Md. 644Ballam v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction (2001)
- 196 Md. 646Bryant v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (2001)
- 196 Md. 648Thomas v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction (2001)
- 196 Md. 649Belch v. Raymond (2001)
- 196 Md. 651Loane v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (2001)
- 196 Md. 652Adkins v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction (2001)
- 196 Md. 654Czaplinski v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (2001)
- 196 Md. 665Neal v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (1950)
- 196 Md. 666Dorsey v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (1950)
- 196 Md. 668Chandler v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction (1950)
- 196 Md. 669Hanson v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (1950)
- 196 Md. 670Freeland v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (1950)
- 196 Md. 672Johnson v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (2001)
- 196 Md. 675Terry v. Superintendent of Maryland State Reformatory for Males (1950)
- 196 Md. 676Roberts v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction (1950)
- 196 Md. 679Hirons v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (2001)
- 196 Md. 680Jones v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction (1950)
- 196 Md. 681Byars v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (1950)
- 196 Md. 683Reeder v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary (2001)