Anderson v. Wartenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1944
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stock v. Wayne Circuit Judge · Huddleston v. Charles Amos & Co. · Goldhamer v. Wayne Circuit Judge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That the defendant chose to rely upon what he considered to be negotiations for an adjustment with plaintiff’s attorneys, rather than to protect his rights through an appearance and defense in the case or an appeal within five days after judgment, is unfortunate, but in our ..opinion insufficient, under the authorities cited, to warrant granting a delayed appeal. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. Reaume““Appeals may be authorized by the circuit court, or by the circuit judge at chambers, after the expiration of five days, when the party making the appeal has been prevented from taking the same by circumstances not under his control.” * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Feldman v. Zimmerman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.