Nye v. Bach’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 1947
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rosenau v. Peterson · Primock v. Goldenberg · Guthrie v. Brown · Montague v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co. · Duffey v. Curtis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Defendant argues that plaintiff should not have driven directly in the path of the danger that must have been apparent to him. It cannot be said as a matter of laAv that any danger was apparent. Plaintiff Avas in the intersection first, was on his own side of the highway, and clearly had the right of way. He was justified in assuming that defendant would respect that right.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.