Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 MO 35 - State v. Bateman

State v. Bateman’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 1962
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1962

8 state decisions

401906191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Taylor · State v. Harvey · State v. Graves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(T)he defendant is simply charged with an assault with intent to rob, and the instruction complained of required the jury to find that the assault was made with such intent, which is followed with a clear explanation of what constitutes robbery, and this is manifestly all that was required and submitted to the jury, every essential element constituting the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.