Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

196 N.C. 438

146 S.E 73

State v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 2, 1929

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1929-01-02

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-01-02

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1982

4 state decisions

101929193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Brogden, J.

¶1 It does not appear from the record that the defendant was offered an opportunity in open court to be heard upon the question as to whether he had violated the conditions upon which the original *439 judgment was suspended. Neither is there evidence or finding of fact to the effect that any of said conditions had been violated.

¶2 The exception of the defendant to the judgment appealed from is sustained. S. v. Hardin, 183 N. C., 815, 112 S. E., 593; S. v. Phillips, 185 N. C., 614, 115 S. E., 893; S. v. Gooding, 194 N. C., 271, 139 S. E., 436.

¶3 Costs constitute no part of the punishment of the defendant. S. v. Crook, 115 N. C., 760, 20 S. E., 513.

¶4 Liability for costs in criminal cases is regulated by 0. S., 1268-12Y0. These sections provide in substance that a defendant upon failing to pay costs may be imprisoned “until the costs shall be paid, or until he shall otherwise be discharged according to law.”

¶5 Error.

/196/nc/438 · .json · Public domain