Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

196 N.C. 475

146 S.E 146

Heaton v. . Heaton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 9, 1929

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1929-01-09

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-01-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1985

5 state decisions

201929193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BeogdeN, J.

¶1 Tbe indexing and tbe cross-indexing of deeds, mortgages and deeds of trust is an essential part of tbe registration thereof. Therefore a deed, mortgage, or deed of trust not properly indexed and cross-indexed is not properly registered, and registration is necessary to *476 defeat tbe rights of subsequent purchasers for value. N. C. Code 1927, sec. 3561, requires that “the naines of the parties to all liens, etc.,” shall be shown on the index. The indexing of the instrument in controversy did not comply with the statute; hence the ruling of the trial judge was correct. Clement v. Harrison, 193 N. C., 825, 138 S. E., 308.

¶2 Affirmed.

/196/nc/475 · .json · Public domain