Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 N.C. App. 438 - State v. Bunch

196 N.C. App. 438 - State v. Bunch’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Arizona v. Fulminante · Neder v. United States · Rose v. Clark · Washington v. Recuenco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First, that the defendant [committed] (or) [attempted to commit] (name felony, e.g., robbery). (Define the felony and enumerate its elements, using the Pattern Jury Instruction for that felony.) “Second, that while [committing] (or) [attempting to commit] (name felony), the defendant killed the victim with a deadly weapon. “fAnd Third! . . ., that the defendant’s act was a proximate cause of the victim’s death. A proximate cause is a real cause, a cause without which the victim’s death would not have occurred.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No person shall be convicted of any crime but by the unanimous verdict of a jury in open court, except that a person accused of any criminal offense for which the State is not seeking a sentence of death in superior court may, in writing or on the record in the court and with the consent of the trial judge, waive jury trial, subject to procedures prescribed by the General Assembly. The General Assembly may, however, provide for other means of trial for misdemeanors, with the right of appeal for trial de novo .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he State must prove three [3] things beyond a reasonable doubt. First, that the Defendant or someone with whom he was acting in concert committed first degree burglary and/or robbery with a dangerous weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.