196 N.C. App. 726 - Sullivan v. Pender County’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2021
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency · Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co. · A-S-P Associates v. City of Raleigh · In re T.R.P. · In Re TRP
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]lthough the North Carolina Constitution does not contain an express provision prohibiting the taking of private property for public use without payment of just compensation, this Court has inferred such a provision as a fundamental right integral to the 'law of the land' clause in article I, section 19 of our Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.