196 N.C. App. 770 - Webb v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · 115 N.C. App. 377 - Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint Venture · Goldston v. American Motors Corp. · Sharpe v. Worland · 119 N.C. App. 730 - North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Page
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While a final judgment is always appealable, an interlocutory order may be appealed immediately only if (i) the trial court certifies the case for immediate appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b), or (ii) the order “affects a substantial right of the appellant that would be lost without immediate review.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`the burden of showing this Court that the order deprives [them] of a substantial right which would be jeopardized absent a review prior to a final determination on the merits.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.