Crabtree v. Cook’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Strother v. Hutchinson · Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co. · 94 Ohio App. 3d 579 - Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be an obstacle that blocks or clogs the roadway and not merely a thing or condition that hinders or impedes the use of the roadway or that may have the potential to do so.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Except as otherwise provided in section 3746.24 of the Revised Code, political subdivisions are liable for injury, death, or loss to person or property caused by their * * * negligent failure to remove obstructions from public roads * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dietz v. Harshbarger“might constitute obstructions for purposes of [a] bicyclist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Columbus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.