Dudley v. Dudley’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 110 Ohio App. 3d 46 - Wiltberger v. Davis · 81 Ohio App. 3d 286 - Ceol v. Zion Industries, Inc. · 94 Ohio St. 3d 432 - Soler v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is determined without reference to what the individual knew or believed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“not warranted under existing law, cannot be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or cannot be supported by a good faith argument for the establishment of new law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A court's factual determinations are accorded a degree of deference and will not be disturbed on appeal if there is competent, credible evidence in the record to support them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re T.D.A.J.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.