Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 196 OHIOAPP3D 764 - Thompson v. Thompson

Thompson v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hoyt v. Hoyt · Neville v. Neville · 83 Ohio App. 3d 559 - Layne v. Layne · 57 Ohio St. 3d 131 - Tschantz v. Ferguson · State Ex Rel. Finkbeiner v. Lucas County Board of Elections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]etermine [an] appeal on its merits on the assignments of error set forth in the briefs under App.R. 16.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “ratio of the number of years of employment of the employed spouse during the marriage to the total years of his or her employment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Using the process set forth in R.C. 3105.80 through 3105.90, a trial court can issue a DOPO, thereby requiring the administrator of a public-retirement program to distribute benefits divided by a divorce decree directly to a nonmember ex-spouse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.